Asus Strix 1070 Vs 1070 Ti
Cost at present 370$ Games supported 99% Price at present 435$ Games supported 99% Comparison of graphics bill of fare architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters. Value for money To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices. General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base of operations clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and adding speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, just for precise assessment you accept to consider their benchmark and gaming examination results. Note that ability consumption of some graphics cards tin can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Data on compatibility with other estimator components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and charabanc (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors take no dedicated VRAM and use a shared office of system RAM. Types and number of video connectors nowadays on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise merely for desktop reference ones (and then-chosen Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Supported technological solutions. This data volition evidence useful if you need some detail technology for your purposes. APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs. Not-gaming benchmark performance comparing. Note that overall benchmark functioning is measured in points in 0-100 range. This is our combined benchmark functioning rating. Nosotros are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if y'all discover some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we unremarkably fix problems quickly. This is probably the nigh ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics carte du jour a thorough evaluation nether diverse load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the terminal beingness done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Criterion coverage: 25% 3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX eleven criterion by Futuremark. Information technology used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark eleven is at present superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 characteristic level 10 criterion that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using stock-still resolution of 1280x720. Simply like Ice Tempest benchmark, it has been discontinued in Jan 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: xiv% Fire Strike is a DirectX eleven benchmark for gaming PCs. It features 2 carve up tests displaying a fight betwixt a humanoid and a peppery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics menu benchmark combined from xi dissimilar examination scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group. Criterion coverage: nine% Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete criterion, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Tempest was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX eleven feature level 9 to display a battle between 2 space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in Jan 2020, it is at present superseded by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 8% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics carte benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on directly usage of GPU'south processing ability, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Grouping. Benchmark coverage: v% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU'southward processing ability, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Criterion coverage: 5% Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and GeForce GTX 1070. Unremarkably measured in megahashes per second. Allow's run into how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Here are the average frames per 2nd in a large set of popular games beyond different resolutions: −81.6% +81.6% +eight.ix% −viii.9% −188% +188% −131% +131% +8.9% −8.9% +7.5% −vii.5% +0% +0% −163% +163% +8.9% −viii.9% +8.9% −8.ix% −63.iii% +63.3% −95.9% +95.ix% +8.nine% −8.9% −55.ane% +55.1% +8.9% −8.ix% −143% +143% −91.8% +91.8% +8.ix% −eight.9% +eight% −8% +ii% −2% −147% +147% +8.9% −8.9% +8.nine% −8.ix% +6.5% −half-dozen.five% +14% −xiv% −97.6% +97.6% −145% +145% +8.9% −8.9% +14.5% −fourteen.five% +8.ix% −viii.9% +3.7% −3.7% +8.nine% −8.9% +xiii.3% −thirteen.3% +2.2% −two.2% +6.4% −six.4% +14.iii% −14.iii% +8.nine% −viii.ix% −26.5% +26.5% +eight.9% −8.9% +8.9% −8.nine% +five.iii% −5.iii% +81.5% −81.5% −2% +2% +6.7% −vi.vii% +8.9% −8.9% −1.two% +1.2% +8.ix% −eight.nine% +ten.3% −ten.3% +vii% −seven% +2.v% −2.5% +8.9% −8.9% +44.i% −44.1% +viii.9% −8.9% +viii.ix% −8.9% +8.7% −8.7% +172% −172% +seven.7% −7.seven% +ix.3% −9.3% +three.8% −3.8% +8.9% −eight.9% +four.4% −iv.4% +eight.9% −8.ix% +11.4% −eleven.4% +10.5% −10.5% +five.8% −5.eight% +eight.ix% −8.9% Technical Metropolis couldn't decide between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 The differences in performance seem too small-scale. Should you still have questions concerning selection between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Do yous call back we are right or mistaken in our pick? Vote by clicking "Like" button almost your favorite graphics card. The nearest GeForce GTX 1070 Ti'due south AMD equivalent is Radeon RX Vega 64, which is faster by 1% and higher by iii positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1070 Ti: The nearest GeForce GTX 1070's AMD equivalent is Radeon RX Vega 56, which is faster by ane% and college by 1 position in our rating. Hither are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1070: Nosotros selected several comparisons of graphics cards with functioning more or less shut to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. Here you lot tin see the user rating of the graphics cards, likewise as rate them yourself. Here yous tin enquire a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPS1070 Ti vs 1070
General info
Identify in operation rating 76 91 Value for money 56.75 36.73 Architecture Pascal (2016−2021) Pascal (2016−2021) GPU lawmaking name Pascal GP104 Pascal GP104 Market segment Desktop Desktop Release date two November 2017 (4 years ago) half dozen May 2016 (6 years ago) Launch price (MSRP) $399 $379 Toll now $370 (0.9x MSRP) $435 (1.1x MSRP) Technical specs
Pipelines / CUDA cores 2432 no information CUDA cores no data 1920 Core clock speed 1607 MHz no information Boost clock speed 1683 MHz no data Number of transistors 7,200 million 7,200 million Manufacturing procedure engineering 16 nm xvi nm Thermal design power (TDP) 180 Watt no data Maximum GPU temperature no data 94 °C Texture fill rate 255.eight 202.0 Floating-indicate performance 8,186 gflops 6,463 gflops Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Jitney back up no data PCIe 3.0 Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16 Length 267 mm 10.5" (26.7 cm) Superlative no information 4.376" (11.1 cm) Width 2-slot no data Recommended organisation power (PSU) no data 500 Watt Supplementary power connectors 1x viii-pin no information SLI options no data + Retention
Retention type GDDR5 no data Maximum RAM amount eight GB no information Retention bus width 256 Bit 256 Bit Memory clock speed 8000 MHz 8 GB/s Memory bandwidth 256.3 GB/south 256 GB/s Shared retentivity - - Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort DP ane.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI Multi monitor support no data + HDMI + no data Chiliad-SYNC support + + Technologies
GPU Boost no data 3.0 VR Ready + + Ansel no data + API back up
DirectX 12 (12_1) no data Shader Model vi.4 6.4 OpenGL 4.6 4.v OpenCL 1.ii no data Vulkan one.2.131 + CUDA half dozen.1 + Benchmark performance
Overall score
Mining hashrates
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) no data 832 Mh/s Decred / DCR (Decred) no information 2.83 Gh/s Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) no data 28.69 Mh/south Siacoin / SC (Sia) no data ane.75 Gh/s Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) no data 0.65 kh/s Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) no data 435.21 Sol/s Gaming performance
Full HD 111 118 1440p 72 69 4K 53 48 Full Hd
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 45−50 Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin'due south Creed Odyssey 45−50 89 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50 45−50 Battleground 5 45−50 141 Telephone call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−fifty 113 Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 45−fifty Far Cry v 114 106 Far Weep New Dawn 107 107 Forza Horizon four 45−50 129 Hitman 3 45−50 45−l Horizon Cypher Dawn 45−fifty 45−fifty Cherry Dead Redemption 2 45−l lxxx Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50 96 Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50 45−l Total HD
Loftier Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50 76 Assassin'southward Creed Valhalla 45−50 45−50 Battlefield 5 45−50 119 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50 94 Cyberpunk 2077 45−fifty 45−fifty Far Cry 5 108 100 Far Cry New Dawn 103 101 Forza Horizon 4 45−50 121 Hitman iii 45−l 45−50 Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 45−50 Metro Exodus 66 62 Blood-red Dead Redemption two 45−50 43 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 42 83 The Witcher 3: Wild Chase 45−50 120 Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50 45−50 Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassinator'due south Creed Odyssey 63 55 Assassinator'due south Creed Valhalla 45−50 45−50 Battlefield 5 111 107 Cyberpunk 2077 45−l 45−l Far Cry 5 102 90 Far Cry New Dawn 93 91 Forza Horizon four 100 94 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72 63 Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50 45−50 1440p
Loftier Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−l 62 Hitman 3 45−50 45−50 Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 45−50 Metro Exodus twoscore 38 Crimson Dead Redemption 2 45−50 27 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 51 52 1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48 45 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−fifty 45−50 Battlefield 5 83 84 Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 45−l Far Cry 5 75 68 Far Cry New Dawn 76 71 Forza Horizon four 81 79 Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50 45−50 4K
High Preset
Phone call of Duty: Modernistic Warfare 45−50 34 Hitman 3 45−50 45−50 Horizon Cipher Dawn 45−fifty 45−50 Metro Exodus 25 23 Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50 xviii Shadow of the Tomb Raider 28 26 The Witcher 3: Wild Chase 47 43 4K
Ultra Preset
Assassinator'south Creed Odyssey 27 26 Assassin'due south Creed Valhalla 45−fifty 45−l Battlefield v 47 45 Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 45−50 Far Cry 5 39 35 Far Cry New Dawn 42 38 Forza Horizon 4 55 52 Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50 45−50 Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating 48.76 45.24 Novelty 2 November 2017 6 May 2016 Cost $399 $379 Memory bandwidth 256.iii 256
Bandage your vote
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1070 Ti past AMD
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1070 by AMD
Like GPU comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-GTX-1070-Ti-vs-GeForce-GTX-1070
Posted by: caldwellsciask.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Asus Strix 1070 Vs 1070 Ti"
Post a Comment